fbpx

Alternative plot directions

Alternative plot directions

Alternative plot directions

Do you remember those ‘choose-your-own-adventure’ books for children that were in vogue in the 1970s and ’80s? The idea was that the reader, rather than the author, had some measure of say over the direction of the plot. Such fun for a child; though tricky to write, I imagine!
 
No doubt you’ve read a book or watched a film and wondered how the story would have turned out had the plot moved in a different direction. What if Darcy and Elizabeth had never reconciled in Pride and Prejudice? What if Catherine hadn’t died in Wuthering Heights – or had chosen Healthcliff over Edgar? What if Jack had managed to climb onto the floating door with Rose at the end of Titanic and lived?
 
Before I start writing I map out a plot carefully. So I have already decided upon the ending before Chapter 1 commences. For my novels, a satisfying plot needs to be consistent of two elements:
 
  • The main character ends up – in whatever way – with her soul-mate.
  • There is a happy ending.

On these grounds, I rejected the following alternative plot directions for Burning Embers:

 
  • Coral falls in love once more with her ex-fiancé, Dale, and rejects Rafe.
  • Coral refuses to swallow her pride and go to Rafe when he is ill.
  • Coral believes everything the witch doctor tells her, and will not be swayed.
  • Rafe refuels his affair with Coral’s step-mother.
  • Rafe ends up with Morgana, the dancer with whom he’s been having an affair.
  • Rafe is unable to share with Coral the truth of his past.
  • Rafe dies from his illness.

 The 1998 romantic film Sliding Doors explored the idea of plot alternatives. However, it’s not a film I enjoyed for the simple reason that I think the message carried forth in the diverging plots is not uplifting or positive. The plot splits in two as the protagonist, Helen, rushes to catch an underground train. Helen 1 gets on the train in time; Helen 2 does not. Helen 1 gets home to find her boyfriend cheating on her with another woman. Helen 2 does not. The ending? Helen 1, who has gone on a great journey of self-discovery and met a new, lovely man, dies. Helen 2, who hasn’t achieved much at all in the plot, lives (and meets the new, lovely man of the other plot branch, just to confuse you). To my mind, that’s the wrong way around – to develop a character and have her find her soul-mate but then kill her off isn’t a comfortable plot for a romance story; and neither is a woman doing very little developing throughout and then meeting a nice man at the end of the story.

In the right plot, I think, the reader has to have the sense that other possibilities than those explored by the author exist in the plot – but see clearly that those don’t make sense in the world the author has created, and know that the plot alternatives would lead to a less comforting, enjoyable read. It’s a bit like reading a child’s choose-your-own-adventure book. You may have enjoyed the author’s clever structuring, but I’m sure the only ending you really appreciated was the one that made sense for the character and the story that was built up – not the ending in which little Johnny took the wrong branch of a tunnel and fell to his doom into a snake-filled pit…

Share this post

Share this post

Share this post